Book and Movie Reviews

Profaned Pulpit – The Jack Schaap Story

Jerry Kaifetz is concerned that we are over-reacting to the problem of child abuse within the realm of the IFB.  His biggest fear is that we will become our own enemy.  How will this be done?  By accepting LGBT’s into our Facebook survivor groups and treating them as normal people instead of sinners who need repentance! He also doesn’t like it us spouting off liberal political or religious views.  As far as he’s concerned, we’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater and the baby’s name is Jesus!

Profaned Pulpit: The Jack Schaap Story has been rushed into print by Jerry D. Kaifetz, Jack Schaap’s one time close friend. This comes on the heels of Jack Schaap’s arrest for taking a minor across state lines for sexual purposes.  Jack Schaap is the former pastor of First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana.  Jack Hyles, who pastored the church before Schaap, is credited with being the ‘Baptist Pope’ of the Independent Fundamental Baptist movement.  Hyles allegedly had an affair with a church secretary, but this pales compared to news he defended one of his bus captains, A.V. Ballenger,  who was accused of molesting a bus kid by saying, “He just likes little girls!”

Jerry Kaifetz was there when some of these stories broke.  He was with the bus kid whom A.V. Ballenger abused.  No real details on what kind of conversation they had, but he knew them!  He also knows that Jack Schaap’s sermon ‘The Polished Shaft’ was directed at one particular woman and comes within a breath of mentioning her name.  It’s obvious he wants to out her to the public.  I hope she has a good lawyer on her side.

Carrie, as he calls this woman, threatens to bring down the whole operation.  She had been in an inappropriate relationship with Schaap and had knowledge of victims coming together to hold the church accountable.  Schaap’s response was to allegedly call her out from the pulpit (without mentioning her name) and act like he was jerking off with a stick. Who wouldn’t?

Jerry Kaifetz is the man who designed and sold the 100% for Hyles buttons.  He eventually read Fundamental Seduction (Voyle Glover’s book about Jack Hyles) but when he revealed this fact to Schaap in a public restaurant, Shaap’s response was to walk out on him.

Kaifetz could use that example and spend the bulk of the book talking about the tendencies of IFB leaders to stick their heads in the sand.  It only gets a casual mention.  Kaifetz believes the real problem with Schaap can be blamed on pornography.  His evidence is pretty sketchy.  It begins with Kaifetz taking Schaap to Perdue to witness to college students.  Jack sees how the woman are dressed and, in a line that could have been out of Bible Madness (“She’s just a babe in Christ, and what a babe!”), remarks that the girls are walking around ‘in fishnets with no underclothing!”.   That, and a mention of Schaap saying he came across a porno page on his laptop, is Jerry’s big proof!  I think all of us, especially if you’re on Facebook, encounter this phenomena.

Jerry talks about pornography a lot!  He could address some of the real reasons those of us, abused or not, have rejected the cruelty of fundamentalism.   Can you imagine a victim of clergy abuse trying to make sense out of Lot and his daughters? Lot had sex with his daughters and is still regarded as a ‘just man’? His daughters were responsible? That makes it okay?  Can just men abuse his daughters and still find God’s favor?

If we don’t have pornography as a whipping boy,  we’re forced back to the bible where sexually dysfunctional men will tell us how obedience is prized over sacrifice to the point where even child molesters are regarded as holy men.  To regard them as anything less is to have a ‘bad attitude’.

Jerry could talk about that, but instead goes on about porno instead of cruel and illogical preachers.

The only good part about Jerry Kaifetz’s porno obsession is he at least mentions the issues where the Dave/Brenda Hyles swingers ads are allegedly found.  My biggest beef with the Dave Hyles swing ad controversy is in order to know it was Dave and Brenda, you would have to answer the ad to see if it’s really from them.  And Dave, you would think, would be smarter than put his picture, or any other picture that people would recognize, in a swinger ad.  Now I’ll have to find the ads and get back to ya’!  They are: Adam Swing World, September ’89, June ’90, March ’91.

Jerry is disappointed in the 95% of fundamentalism that got caught, but he still believes there’s good in the movement. He still sees an honest need for fundamentalism.  In a chapter detailing why he believes Hyles was successful, Jerry writes that men have this innate need to fight against PETA and the ACLU.  Jack Hyles came along to fulfil this very natural need!

Jerry keeps looking for those honest fundies and keeps finding himself in one corrupt situtation after another.  The book is short on details, but after he leaves First Baptist he goes to Fairhaven where he uncovers corruption with Roger Voegtlin who, like Jerry, was also anti-Jack.  Surprisingly, Jerry has a controversy with Roger although since they’re birds of a feather it’s difficult to point out what that controversy is. Basically, if you ever see Jerry Kaifetz in your church, run or get a video camera!  Get Anderson Cooper on speed dial because something’s about to go down! That man is turning himself into the Van Helsing of fundamentalism.

Jerry does depart from the IFB in a very surprising way: by doubting the salvation experiences of children.

Jerry realizes he has never heard Jack Schaap’s salvation testimony.  He finally sees it on video.  Schaap admits to getting saved at the age of five.  Since Kaifetz now doubts whether five year olds can understand sin and salvation, he now doubts Jack Schaap was ever saved in the first place.

If there is one controversy that would send Hyles-styled fundamentalism into the mud it would be doubting the salvation experiences of children saved through the bus ministry.

You give up a lot when when you give up testimonies of children.

The vast amount of souls won on the Hammond Bus Ministry was because of the conversions of very young children.  If we accept their testimonies of salvation as valid can we also accept their testimonies of abuse as equally valid?    When a child remembers being sexually assaulted, it’s considered an event so out of the child’s scope that it’s very description is considered testimony of a truth that happened.   If we reject a 5 year old’s account of being saved, should we respect their accounts of abuse?

Jerry doesn’t get into this, but I thank him for opening that can of worms. Between all the homophobia, fear of survivor groups, and all around lack of trust, Jerry recommends that we call the police, doesn’t he?  I’ll go back and look at the book again. Not remembering a specific ‘call the police’ segment, but I’ll pretend one’s in there. Common sense must still rule.

10 thoughts on “Profaned Pulpit – The Jack Schaap Story

  1. SO many errors, so little time. SO many misunderstandings, misinterpretations and outright falsehood in this post, I would have to write another book just to address them. Sorry . . not worth the time to confront a dishonest writer with a tragically skewed & misguided agenda. I will gladly let “Profaned Pulpit” do my talking for me. I think it does that very well. That’s my story . . .and I’m sticking to it! Maybe folks should read it & make up their own minds. Jerry D. Kaifetz, Ph.D., author of “Profaned Pulpit—The Jack Schaap Story.”

  2. Obviously, DWalker read your book Jerry and this is what he got out of it. While I agree that LGBT people do need to be accepted and treated as people, that’s not going to cure the IFBs. Pornography also has nothing to do with it. And as a former IFB, I think it’s a cult and there’s no place for it on earth and I think churches should be taxed and there should be a crackdown on cults. I haven’t read your book and I probably won’t. Because all “misunderstandings” aside, if you don’t have any real details or proof in your story about what happened to Jack Hyles without the whole BS about porno and whatever, then you’re just trying to make money on the title of your book.

    • Thanks for speculating on something you know nothing about: my motives. If you ever meet someone who was closer to the FBC abuse and saw more than I did up close, I would like to meet that person. How you possibly could know that I have no real details in Profaned Pulpit without having read the book will have to remain a mystery to me. Sorry, but that just doesn’t sound like a very intelligent statement. There are voluminous details provided. I do agree that the IFB movement is very cultish, if not an outright cult. I have never given them any quarter, contrary to what a few misinformed idiots may think. Why don’t you try to rise above the personalities and understand that the common cause to expose the IFB Movement transcends all of that. This is no time to be petty or small minded, or to focus an anyone’s motives that you could not possibly know anything about.

      • That’s pretty interesting and potentially damning. How many IFB abuses and details did you see up close? The biggest criticism of you on the internet is that you tend to give people wiggle room to feel better about not contacting the authorities. If you personally witnessed the cover up of child molestation or abuse, did you immediately contact the police?

      • By the time I became involved, so were the authorities. I stepped in in the role of victim advocate AFTER arrests were made. I never ever witnessed any sexual abuse personally. You inferences to the contrary are malicious, unsupported and despicable. You should provide the evidence for your allegations or keep your mouth shut. That is what decent people do. They also back up statement alleging that I gave perpetrators “wiggle room to feel better about not contacting the authorities.” If you have evidence to that effect, you should bring it out. I hereby challenge you do that, or to to stop with the gossip & slander.

      • You sure do talk and act like a fundamentalist for someone who says they burned their bridges. Just go onto the DoRight Fairhavens or whatever you’re affiliated with and state it a clear and understandable manner that there’s no excuse for not notifying the authorities. Fundamentalism isn’t a core of beliefs anymore. It’s an attitude that stops people from asking questions. You have demonstrated this in practically all your posts. Why don’t you revisit this thread in Facebook which you abandoned and clarify your thoughts in an unmistakable way? Specifically, answer Pauline’s post:

      • I have not claimed to be a Fundamentalist since 1989. I don’t owe you or anyone else an explanation or a defense of that position. There are over 250,000 words from my writings out there. They speak adequately for me. I believe the fundamentals of the Christian faith. If that makes me a Fundamentalist to you, then knock yourself out & call me whatever you want. My position and policies could not be any more public. This is my last response to these personal attacks and petty, distracting nonsense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s